Tuesday, May 10, 2011
Whenstatements confuse
How can we return to normal when from the highest political leaders, unions, social and judicial, defend and / or promote the mess?.
Society is tired of claims that go beyond the proper scope of the issue to complicate the rest of the population with roadblocks, and access routes or blocking oil facilities and service stations. Is that the atmosphere of chaos in which society moves, the first to express discontent and protests, is the street. Similarly
seemingly unstoppable crime, we are concerned, we grieve and conditions us. We hope that the criminals are behind bars, not to have us to live behind bars, and requires the state police force more efficient, justice more agile and strong and suitable jails, not for punishment but for rehabilitation of the individual.
But if those responsible for attacking the causes and the effects they produce, are placed on the sidewalk out front, the situation can become irritants limits. Let
The former Minister of National Education and current Senator Daniel Filmus justified the decision of the school saying that Carlos Pellegrini "in the Constitution is the right to request and there is no rule that prevents" and (students) " in no way against any of the rules" . Remember that the Buenos Aires high school is taken by a small group of students, supported by some misplaced teachers and impede access by the authorities. Occupants who are estimated at no more than 20, say that for classes, but the fact is that in a context of anarchy, the establishment can not operate, there is a clear subversion of values \u200b\u200bof learners. With its obtuse statements, Filmus adds gasoline to the fire. Confuse the right to petition, with the capture of the College by the students is amazing on a Senator's Office, to make matters worse, former Minister of Education. Filmus forget that Article 14 of the Constitution on the other hand, guarantees the right of "teach and learn" . Another
not located in the country's social reality is the Minister of the Supreme Court Eugenio Zaffaroni, who spoke out against repression in the traffic courts. Once again, bad uses the word "repression" . The police only following orders, when to leave an estate or a factory by a decision of a judge, and it acts according to law. not about "repression" devalued term in Argentina today, but to avoid social chaos and to ensure constitutional rights such as free travel or to use and dispose of the property.
Zaffaroni also insists that "there are too many prisoners" When the opposite is true, there are more criminals on the streets than in prisons and it warns that any citizen against the crime wave that punishes us.
is true that our prisons are overcrowded and inmates housed twice for which they were designed, but a figure of 107 prisoners per 100,000 population, which is ours, is very low compared with that of Chile which has 205 and very poor compared to the 726 individuals who imprison U.S., which has a total prison population of over 2.3 million inmates. We know that ideas always passed to decriminalize Zaffaroni crime, but the fact is that society should not be confused with statements that more than irritating, tangle. Insecurity requires more police, justice swiftly and effectively, build more prisons for high, medium and low security to contain individuals who commit crimes and do not let loose to continue in the crime. And of course, to implement social programs that prevent the entry of young people into crime. Both
Filmus with absurd statements like Zaffaroni, that beyond its traditional position, confused, just please do to the citizens who are claiming to live in peace, order and tranquility.
0 comments:
Post a Comment