TIMBA THE STOCK MARKET GAME COLLECTION The stock timba game .... by Mario Roberto Salvatierra announced
The end of the story that there would be no class struggle, but they were coming down because the man proposes and the class struggle has. The objective conditions are ripe. INTERNATIONAL
"The game, timba market, the economy is real, what dreams are real life"
The imperialist bourgeoisie is already mired in the worst horrors or at least that's what I think but the worst is yet to come, the door to the horror of horrors has not yet begun to open, his seven keys are vanishing. Security is no longer such, the dream of being the End of History slips like sand between your toes, Fukuyama must be at the bottom of his bed crying for sudden death, the role of prophet of the financial bourgeoisie was short, too little. So long will all theories invented by the factories of imperialism. The proletariat will rise from the ashes, like Phoenix, to begin the true history of mankind, without exploiters or exploited. Only hear the song of life of all humans. That is the true horror that comes close to the imperialist bourgeoisie and not imperialist: the loss of their sacred PRIVATE OWNERSHIP OF THE MEANS OF PRODUCTION. Their disappearance as a class. Worldwide sound the anthem of war and peace of the proletariat, INTERNATIONAL. War song exploitation, war against the exploiters. Peace for all the exploited and oppressed, peace to all the disinherited of the earth. Tell each other they are dreams and we will say that sooner or later will become reality. ALL CONDITIONS ARE OBJECTIVE, MISSING THE SUBJECTIVE, the masses move in the direction of creating them. Capitalism smells of death.
write about all the tribulations of capitalism is a barren field and cumbersome for the vast majority of the bourgeois economists and also for those who call themselves Marxist economists, who have left buried under a pile of lies and half truths true vision of class and have put the economy as encompassing all of humanity when, as all phenomena of a class society, has the stamp of the ruling class. Therefore, one benefit: the ruling class, and others suffer the consequences, harm: the dominated class, subject to the dictates of another class. Lost, like so many things, shame along with the vision of class, for the sake of possibility that allowed them to share crumbs from the banquet of imperialist finance capital. Now it will be hard to readjust, but not impossible as they are accustomed to always fall unemployed. Will, without a blush, according to state intervention in the economy, with the same "conviction" that yesterday defended the "free market" against any state intervention and make great "discoveries" that Karl Marx did not ... Will they remember that all wealth is produced by human labor ...? "Unmasking the American imperialist bourgeoisie that through his brainless president is committing a fraud similar to that made Nixon when he became president and ordered the convertibility of the dollar? Because it should be clear that the billion dollars the U.S. State intended to "save" the banks have the sole support of the printing press to print. And as the convertibility of the dollar decreed in the seventies, they will pay the rest of the world with his ailing productions.
With the convertibility of the dollar also fell from Breton Woods treaty. With the problems of the Middle East can not argue that there is oil to support the dollar. The U.S. economy is sustained by bonds of Treasury debt, most are in the central banks of Japan and China. Therefore, the American state will "hold" to banks with more debt and not to genuine resources, because it can not. It is the most emphatic demonstration of a fallacy, for those who held and hold that the production of weapons or "military Keynesianism" is a valid way for imperialism ... The weapons do not reproduce their value, they do make noise and kill human beings more or less.
was announced the bailout from the U.S. State and accepted, without shame, by the fiercest defenders of "free market", although everyone knows that is not the first and perhaps the last, since this transaction began back in 1990 when Federal Reserve was to "save" a fund that had a multimillion-dollar debt. Then came the "help" to the dot-com companies, energy companies like Enron and so on ...
State intervention is not new in the United States. And, as elsewhere, these interventions are carefully hidden from the eyes of the population, because it means the use and misuse of public money for private companies or individuals. In short: the population does not participate or benefit from the profits, phenomenal by the way, private companies, but shares the losses ... A SCAM. As the scam that meant the nationalization of private debt in 1982, Domingo Cavallo made in our country. As well as the 16,000 million dollars that put the government of Cristina Fernández for banks compared to the first tremor of the bags in the world. The proletariat paid
work losses of the bourgeoisie in general and particular financial bourgeoisie and the bourgeois state is what determines to be paid. Therefore we should not be surprising or surprised when we read the resumes of the characters who take charge of finance in the world are chosen from the cream of the executives of large companies such as Henry Paulson led Goldman Sachs kidney where he was its chairman until 2006 and now U.S. Treasury Secretary today. Socialize, happily, the losses of the financial system. A fox in the henhouse. Let us see how and how much has scammed the proletariat and the petty bourgeoisie U.S.:
a) In September 2007, Federal Reserve (Fed) cut a series of hikes with a cut of 0.5%, bringing the benchmark rate to 4.75%. In October, fell to 4.5% and 4.25% in December.
b) The government "returned", about 150,000 million dollars, 1% of GDP in taxes for citizens to boost consumer spending.
c) Project was launched on Lifetime. Plan to help citizens who can not pay their mortgages and frozen for thirty days the execution of their homes.
d) After the first half, the government triumphantly announced GDP growth, however, paradoxically, the situation worsens, the balance sheets of companies show great losses and begin the "shots" of the Fed to save them.
e) Bear Stearns, the fifth largest U.S. bank, lost 45.8% of the value of their shares. The Fed was given an emergency loan to avoid bankruptcy but could not be saved. Bear Stearns was sold in May at JP Morgan in $ 236 million, the minimum equivalent of two dollars per share. He had come to trade at $ 66 per share.
f) Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, the largest U.S. mortgage companies are taken over by the government to prevent meltdown. For the operation went more or less, 200,000 million.
g) Lehman Brothers was the second giant fall. This company of 158 years, surviving the Great Depression, lost 73% of its market value and the last was September 13 meeting to sanearla. Two days later, filed for bankruptcy by failing to find a buyer. The Barclays English, bought part of its assets.
h) The Fed spent, the 16/09/1908, 85,000 million dollars to keep the 80% stake in AIG.
i) Merrill Lynch was absorbed by Bank of America for 50,000 million dollars in stock. It expects the transaction to close in the first quarter of next year.
j) The Fed and central banks of Europe, England, Switzerland, Japan and Canada “inyectaron” 247.000 millones de dólares en lo que va desde l4 al 18 de septiembre.
k) De cara a la horrorosa situación, la Santa Alianza de la burguesía instrumenta medidas tras medidas que no pasarán de ser meros parches, porque no tiene la capacidad ni puede revolucionar las fuerzas productivas.
El drama se acerca al final. Se abandonaron los sueños de perpetuidad: ya sólo queda pensar en cómo salvar la ropa. Lo intuyen. La brutal concentración del capital operada hasta hoy no asegura riquezas para nadie, por eso la Morgan Stanley, uno de los pocos sobrevivientes de Wall Street, analiza distintas opciones: fusionarse con Wachovia Corporation, el cuarto banco comercial de Estados Unidos o también trying to sell 49% of its shares to China Investment Corp. collapse, pruritus
racist, ideological, and others. It must be saved "selling his soul to the devil." Today we hear more than any two religious concepts: good and evil, used in reference to what happens in the "markets", but nobody talks about the immense suffering they have already begun to fall on those who are losing their jobs and homes ; those already living in tent cities made up, in the vast majority of human beings who inhabit this planet. Everyone knows that U.S. government actions are not supported by the production of goods and on short notice will become wet paper and increase the already huge debt.
fears that inspired the plan to "rescue" concocted purely and exclusively for Wall Street, around the world become free as they distrust "unsubscribe" in the social scale. It is feared that repeated experiences with similar crises, where the profits end up in private hands and losses are socialized. Fox Henry Paulson tries to reassure the chickens, ensuring that the cost to taxpayers will be minimal ... The economist Allan Meltzer, a former adviser to Reagan, said "This plan represents the worst kind of social democracy." Paradox of liberal conservative ...
Analysts economists and intellectuals of all stripes are wrong to compare the current crisis of 1929-1930. The "exit" raised by Roosevelt's government said it acquired legitimacy because employment from the bourgeois state, a political decision for that reason was supported by the vast majority of the population. It was, nothing more and nothing less than the emergence of the state as a predominant factor in the capitalist economy. Saved the bourgeoisie, but also benefited the proletariat.
This hegemony of finance capital in the capitalist economy radically changed the situation: measures that tend to "save" the banks and financial institutions not have the support of the proletariat in particular and people in general, but on the contrary, generate deep mistrust because they tend to sustain and increase jobs. Therefore, they lose all legitimacy for the proletariat are challenged and resisted because expose their true objectives. We must be strictly honest: no provisions aimed at improving or increasing production, but to maintain the status quo of financial capital. The measures, beyond the ways in which they are implemented, they tend to prolong the agony in which capitalism debate and demonstrate, plainly, that the problem is not financial, but this is only the reflects the inability of the bourgeoisie to solve the problems of production of goods. The production is paralyzed and in outright recession, following the development of the contradiction between private ownership of the means of production and the need for increasing social production.
In another vein, the European and American imperialist bourgeoisie, expose their huge political weakness: they try to show unity but can not carry the political arena to demonstrate the alliance financially. Europe can not deal with the conflict against the United States that opened in the Caucasus and leaves the door open for Russia to regain the political initiative worldwide. Russia has returned to again superpower role in world affairs. The role of guarantor of the independence of Abkhazia and South Ossetia was an overwhelming response to the breakup of the former Yugoslavia, led by U.S. and European imperialist bourgeoisie. The Russian firm stripped the many contradictions between Yankees and Europeans and between countries in the European Union, unable to articulate a single response. Neither could they prosper sanctions against Russia in the field of the Security Council of the United Nations.
The U.S. military quagmire in Iraq and is becoming withdrawn and very soon will be a shameful flight. All attempts to "cover" with the decision to escalate the war in Afghanistan. Decision to which presidential candidate joined two Americans, trying to be different when, in fact, there is no difference. Both are candidates of the financial bourgeoisie imperialist and follow the paths that indicate their masters and the development of the crisis. Afghanistan is a swamp more dangerous than Iraq. In the meantime, Musharraf's resignation and the election Perhvéz the corrupt Bhutto widower Benazhir by signing in the pacification of Pakistan: on the contrary, seems to have hardened the opposition and sectors of the Pakistan Army is not prepared to he happily bomb the border and has violently rejected the American forces.
The Yankees are facing serious problems not only in the Middle East and Asia. Also in Latin America are facing the interests of the bourgeoisie who do not want to tie the loser's car.
Venezuela has allowed the stationing of two Russian strategic bombers to monitor the movement of the IVth revived fleet. In another historic moment this attitude would have been reason enough to justify an invasion. Just as the expulsion of ambassadors from Bolivia and Venezuela. But we must make it clear that this is the expression of inter-bourgeois bid and the steps being taken away are to be revolutionary measures, but fill us with joy. It is clear that the U.S. imperialist bourgeoisie will try to destabilize any bourgeois regime that does not fully complied with their plans. Destabilizing is one thing, quite another to invade ...
There are similarities and differences between the processes taking place in our continent. The proletariat has been defeated with greater or lesser degree. The defeat disbanded or liquidated political vanguards of the region, therefore, the subjective conditions are behind the reactions of the masses throughout the continent. This delay is mounted on sections of the bourgeoisie or petty bourgeoisie to develop policies "progressive" in the speech, but, in reality, deeply reactionary material. The differences are in the developmental history of class struggle in each country. The masses of the continent are walking down a process of exhausting their experiences and the new vanguards to replace declining ones and defector falling into degradation and possibilism.
In Bolivia it is clear the government's role politically and ideologically disarming the proletariat against class enemies, fostering illusions in bourgeois democracy for the sake of an ideal peace, culminating in the peace of the cemeteries for the proletariat. The bourgeoisie of the region and their governments are reaching the limits of the measures "progressives" who are able and willing to take. In a very short time others started to show its true face reactionary. They sound
times the masses, the ones that represent the progress and the only ones able to push forward the wheel of history.