POLITICAL!
ROLE ARE YOU OR NOT?
OR ARE YOU CHARISMATIC?
By Héctor Arenas
Ricárdez time when the future looks almost live by decree, amid a bad kidding democracy decadent culture time. Time for politics, extremely prosaic. Is running, or at least, is in crisis everyday life, the poor has been stripped of the romantic hope of good times, for their failed aspirations. He has been given, as the Cyclops in the Odyssey, as Satan's gospel, like the Magi charming Quixote, the maximum of Charon. the boatman Dante, "losing all hope." Neither right nor left, or center, and there are no ideals, interests of men only "State" and de facto powers. Where are those ideals of social philanthropy seeking instead to seek social justice. or reactionary idealistic front all that is change. Not idealism in which the man believes that his will and intelligence can change their destiny. Not a man who contemplates and lives in fantasy world letting things be done and just.
Politicians do not conquer the power and conscience, consciences are those shipped to claim his mellow voice, promising and pompous. This is a hard truth to recognize and even more for the supposed Left. It is useless to deny the evidence of how they overlap in the dark the famous partisan consensus. It's human nature for the sick society which is in contradiction of their own interests and desires. Sick all the proletariat and the bourgeoisie and most of these middle class every day weaker. Education has been molded with the complex religious authority and servility of man, the boss. Servility tilting the head with a feeling of helplessness that is relieved by the compliment to the above, searching for the father and savior and defender charismatic.
How are our modern politicians? .... Ignorant?, Able?, ... Protagonist? ... Charismatic? ... Vedet? ... Liars? ... Ambition mean? ... Resentful? ... Improvised?, ... ... Get up early, do not know how to start the day and make breakfast in a good restaurant preparing the rumors, nor know how to finish día, porque son huevones para pensar y más para hacer. Se refugian en una frase (Slogan) en un rollo y su proceso mental lo graban en un disket.
En los escenarios griegos habían tres entradas; la de la derecha, la de la izquierda y la del centro. Por la izquierda salía el triagonista, por la derecha, el deutoragonista y por el centro el protagonista. Protagonista significa, muy literalmente, “yo combato primero”. Era la gran voz, el que sostenía la trama, el que ocupaba el centro de la escena y de la atención. Y, puesto que en los dramas griegos el protagonista es siempre el héroe, el que establece normas de acción y de sentimientos, pues resulta también aquél en quien la masa se reconoce because it reflected his own passions in outline worthy and understandable. If the passions are good or bad, that's another question, the viewer, like to possess in the depths of his heart, and comes to believe that it possesses. The protagonists are the product of the times, no matter their nature. It can be a hero, in the most noble and ancient of the word. Or it may be a libertine in the concept of the Greco-Roman. But in both cases, their performance has a seal, a charisma, which makes its way to be and make a valid paradigm for the social strata of his contemporaries. Charisma is the extraordinary quality of a person, whether that quality is effective, discussed or implied. The governed are subject to because of his belief in the quality of a specific person.
charismatic legitimacy of government rests, therefore, believing magical powers, revelations and hero worship. This kind of hero is not subject to the existing order. It is like a fairground mirror, distorted reality returns, amplified and magnified. Just as the public wants to see, especially in this new century in which man feels powerful and proud of the achievement and progress in nanotechnology and cyber tip. This colorful character in whom the society is recognized, often proves to be contradictory and sunset, not in the sense of praise, but because beyond the usual mode of being. They are sure they are worth and how "political" think they are about to touch the sky with your hands.
current stage is critical to our country and much of the world, the nobility of the men whose fate has lined up the difficult task of leading the people across the state in any form of government still exists in many human beings who are protagonists of this responsibility. They are also with his presence and charismatic personality. However, not all necessarily good politicians and leaders are one thing and another. Charls de Gaulle was not at all sympathetic and charismatic, he would not necessarily be leading position despite the entry and during the Second World War, but arguably was the best leader and statesman who so far has been contemporary France. The same with Winston Churchill who happens to represent the old mother Europe during his visit to America in his young stock market crash on Wall Street, the character of pure and dipsomaniac, but maintained the economic and social progress England when this depended on the future in the decade of the 30 or Pius XII Eugenio Pacelli, who before the Sacred College of Cardinals was referring to large economic differences of the people, but acting in a world war.
need our rulers focused its ideal to obtain social justice that seeks economic abundance for all, that every child has a healthy environment, food good and plentiful, and proper education. For all adults work secured and adapted to their capacity. For anyone with an adequate income to keep it effectively in the position of its maximum social service. For every person the opportunity to act on the authorities so that these will give due consideration to their needs and ideas.
The People, not only is the creative force of all material values, is also the unique and inexhaustible source of spiritual values, the first philosopher, the first poet the first time and, for the beauty and genius of his creations and even their tragedies, concerns inexhaustible torrent of great contradiction of what a man perfect ... said the poet.
ROLE ARE YOU OR NOT?
OR ARE YOU CHARISMATIC?
By Héctor Arenas
Ricárdez time when the future looks almost live by decree, amid a bad kidding democracy decadent culture time. Time for politics, extremely prosaic. Is running, or at least, is in crisis everyday life, the poor has been stripped of the romantic hope of good times, for their failed aspirations. He has been given, as the Cyclops in the Odyssey, as Satan's gospel, like the Magi charming Quixote, the maximum of Charon. the boatman Dante, "losing all hope." Neither right nor left, or center, and there are no ideals, interests of men only "State" and de facto powers. Where are those ideals of social philanthropy seeking instead to seek social justice. or reactionary idealistic front all that is change. Not idealism in which the man believes that his will and intelligence can change their destiny. Not a man who contemplates and lives in fantasy world letting things be done and just.
Politicians do not conquer the power and conscience, consciences are those shipped to claim his mellow voice, promising and pompous. This is a hard truth to recognize and even more for the supposed Left. It is useless to deny the evidence of how they overlap in the dark the famous partisan consensus. It's human nature for the sick society which is in contradiction of their own interests and desires. Sick all the proletariat and the bourgeoisie and most of these middle class every day weaker. Education has been molded with the complex religious authority and servility of man, the boss. Servility tilting the head with a feeling of helplessness that is relieved by the compliment to the above, searching for the father and savior and defender charismatic.
How are our modern politicians? .... Ignorant?, Able?, ... Protagonist? ... Charismatic? ... Vedet? ... Liars? ... Ambition mean? ... Resentful? ... Improvised?, ... ... Get up early, do not know how to start the day and make breakfast in a good restaurant preparing the rumors, nor know how to finish día, porque son huevones para pensar y más para hacer. Se refugian en una frase (Slogan) en un rollo y su proceso mental lo graban en un disket.
En los escenarios griegos habían tres entradas; la de la derecha, la de la izquierda y la del centro. Por la izquierda salía el triagonista, por la derecha, el deutoragonista y por el centro el protagonista. Protagonista significa, muy literalmente, “yo combato primero”. Era la gran voz, el que sostenía la trama, el que ocupaba el centro de la escena y de la atención. Y, puesto que en los dramas griegos el protagonista es siempre el héroe, el que establece normas de acción y de sentimientos, pues resulta también aquél en quien la masa se reconoce because it reflected his own passions in outline worthy and understandable. If the passions are good or bad, that's another question, the viewer, like to possess in the depths of his heart, and comes to believe that it possesses. The protagonists are the product of the times, no matter their nature. It can be a hero, in the most noble and ancient of the word. Or it may be a libertine in the concept of the Greco-Roman. But in both cases, their performance has a seal, a charisma, which makes its way to be and make a valid paradigm for the social strata of his contemporaries. Charisma is the extraordinary quality of a person, whether that quality is effective, discussed or implied. The governed are subject to because of his belief in the quality of a specific person.
charismatic legitimacy of government rests, therefore, believing magical powers, revelations and hero worship. This kind of hero is not subject to the existing order. It is like a fairground mirror, distorted reality returns, amplified and magnified. Just as the public wants to see, especially in this new century in which man feels powerful and proud of the achievement and progress in nanotechnology and cyber tip. This colorful character in whom the society is recognized, often proves to be contradictory and sunset, not in the sense of praise, but because beyond the usual mode of being. They are sure they are worth and how "political" think they are about to touch the sky with your hands.
current stage is critical to our country and much of the world, the nobility of the men whose fate has lined up the difficult task of leading the people across the state in any form of government still exists in many human beings who are protagonists of this responsibility. They are also with his presence and charismatic personality. However, not all necessarily good politicians and leaders are one thing and another. Charls de Gaulle was not at all sympathetic and charismatic, he would not necessarily be leading position despite the entry and during the Second World War, but arguably was the best leader and statesman who so far has been contemporary France. The same with Winston Churchill who happens to represent the old mother Europe during his visit to America in his young stock market crash on Wall Street, the character of pure and dipsomaniac, but maintained the economic and social progress England when this depended on the future in the decade of the 30 or Pius XII Eugenio Pacelli, who before the Sacred College of Cardinals was referring to large economic differences of the people, but acting in a world war.
need our rulers focused its ideal to obtain social justice that seeks economic abundance for all, that every child has a healthy environment, food good and plentiful, and proper education. For all adults work secured and adapted to their capacity. For anyone with an adequate income to keep it effectively in the position of its maximum social service. For every person the opportunity to act on the authorities so that these will give due consideration to their needs and ideas.
The People, not only is the creative force of all material values, is also the unique and inexhaustible source of spiritual values, the first philosopher, the first poet the first time and, for the beauty and genius of his creations and even their tragedies, concerns inexhaustible torrent of great contradiction of what a man perfect ... said the poet.
0 comments:
Post a Comment